Phonetically Based

更改位置1
http://www.ling.fju.edu.tw/phono/distributions.html
(加入新學派: Phonetically Based Phonology (2004))


更改位置2
建立Phonetically Based Phonology (2004)連結至以下內容:
--------------------------------------------------

Theory
The central difference between PBP and classical OT is the source of the constraint set. Whereas Prince & Smolensky (1993) assumed that all constraints are universal and innate, PBP subscribes to neither of those assumptions. In contrast, it is assumed that the constraints are derived by speakers or learners on the basis of the available evidence, and of implicit phonetic knowledge, “the speakers’ partial understanding of the physical conditions under which speech is produced and perceived” (Hayes and Steriade, p. 1). This knowledge is potentially universal — every human being can have access to it. But it is not (necessarily) completely innate. Although none of the articles is very explicit on this, and the term acquisition is regrettably absent from the index, it is assumed that “Universal Grammar (UG) [is] primarily [. . . ] a set of abstract analytical predispositions that allow learners to induce grammars from the raw facts of speech” (cf. Hayes, 1999)….

Reference: http://www.vanoostendorp.nl/pdf/phoneticallydriven.pdf
Scholars
Bruce P. Hayes
Robert Kirchner
Donca Steriade
Reference
http://www.vanoostendorp.nl/pdf/phoneticallydriven.pdf
http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/PBP/index.htm
http://www-lfg.stanford.edu/bresnan/fot-final.pdf.
http://www.ling.ed.ac.uk/linguist/issues/16/16-1400.html